I disagree with Ettelbrick’s stance against marriage for homosexuals as being a setback for the liberation movement because she felt that it would make the gay community conform and take away that which makes them unique. Her anti-gay marriage stance is much, she is forgetting the symbolism and values behind marriage that promote a mutual commitment and love bond that comes along with other financial benefits which is always a plus. Homosexual marriage can create a common ground to achieve the respect, acceptance and support of society. I agree with Rachel in that the gay community can continue to spread awareness as well as spread the benefits of marriage.
I support same-sex couples adopting because there are many children that are growing without a family then why not allow two individuals who are willing to provide love and shelter raise a child. Two is always better than one, especially coming from a society of a high rate of single mothers. The only issue that I have with these same sex couple adoptions is that I believe there should be an influence of both genders. It is important in order for the child to fully develop. For example, if a gay couple adopts a boy, there should be at least a prominent female figure in their life such as a grandmother or aunt as a positive role model. If the child is just raised by men, then the child runs the risk of having trouble communicating or interacting with the opposite sex. This is still a new concept in society, thus there will be continuous arguments and issues surrounding these types of adoptions as well as same-sex marriages.
No comments:
Post a Comment